Not every adult U.S. citizen should have the right to vote. Instead, only those who pay taxes to a government should be eligible to vote in that government’s elections. So, for example, under this system, an adult paying sales tax in Rhode Island but no federal taxes would qualify to vote in Rhode Island state elections but not in federal elections. Restricting the right to vote to taxpayers is moral and practical.
After all, what is a vote? A vote is a piece of control over how the government spends taxpayer money. Every government program, every enforced law and every action taken by the government is funded from tax “revenue.” This includes government debt, since it must eventually be repaid, and inflation, since it is a tax on the purchasing power of the dollar. Thus, to function, government takes money from group A and distributes money — in the form of benefits and programs — to group B. Membership in group A and group B may or may not overlap.
[via Max]
White dudes, SMH.
This is the problem when our society conditions white boys to believe all their opinions are valid, you get assholes like this feeling entitled to espouse voter suppression.
(via shepherdsnotsheep)
- November 13 2012 | 16 Notes - Read More →

![theatlantic:
Why Pennsylvania’s Voter ID Law Is Unconstitutional
In time, Crawford v. Marion County Election Board may come to rank with Bush v. Gore as among the worst recent decisions by the Supreme Court. That case has made possible the ongoing campaign to gut the right to vote.
Crawford is directly responsible for Wednesday’s decision by Pennsylvania state judge Robert Simpson to allow that state’s strict voter ID law to take effect. That law is all but certain to cause chaos at some polling places this fall. It may also, according to some credible estimates, disfranchise as many as 9 percent of the state’s eligible voters. There’s little secret about the purpose of the bill. As the state’s Republican House Majority Leader, Mike Turzai, told a partisan audience in June, it “is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania.”
Read more. [Image: Reuters]](http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8v2mjHB0N1qcokc4o1_500.jpg)

![thedailywhat:
Say What Now of the Day: Asked at a press conference about Pennsylvania’s rendition of the anti-abortion bill that requires women to undergo an ultrasound prior to the termination of a pregnancy, the Keystone State’s Republican governor, Tom Corbett, told a reporter that he didn’t feel the legislation went too far because it “exterior not interior” and he wasn’t making women watch.
“I don’t know how you make anybody watch,” Corbett said. “Because you just have to close your eyes.”
Not surprisingly, this didn’t sit well with Democrats, who slammed Corbett for showing “a lack of understanding of medicine and women’s reproductive health issues.”
“It’s unthinkable that he would so casually dismiss this by advising women to just close their eyes,” said former Pennsylvania congressman Patrick Murphy. “Gov. Corbett’s comments are disturbingly offensive, insensitive and out of touch.”
Some 10 states are currently at varying states of debate over a similar ultrasound bill.
[wgal / think.]
Fuck you, Tom Corbett. GET OUT OF MY STATE.](http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0xx87NaRr1qzpwi0o1_500.jpg)

